Showing posts with label tony steward. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tony steward. Show all posts

Sunday, 6 December 2015

The Undoing of Tony Stewart

(This post was originally posted by Emma Hynes on the Coronation Street Blog in November 2015.)

Tony Stewart, an alpha-male cocktail of menace and charisma, with a seemingly endless pot of money and an even greater reserve of self-confidence, sadly bid his farewell to the cobbles this week. Since his return in January 2014 in the form of Terence Maynard, it has been a rollercoaster ride of threats, deception, dodgy dealings, violence and infidelity. Far from a one dimensional ‘villain’, however, Tony’s charm, sense of humour and fearlessness in the face of pretty much anything made him rather endearing, as did his penchant for taking matters into his own hands, particularly when avenging his loved ones.

He returned with one aim: to make up for all the years he’d been an absent father to Jason. This noble aspiration ensured we knew from the off that he couldn’t be all bad, despite the wealth of evidence to the contrary. Within a couple of months he had gotten Jason the gym contract by dubious means, threatened Steve to back off so he could pursue Liz, and started supplying dodgy goods to Barlow’s Buys. He swaggered, schemed, seduced and splashed the cash, and it was great.

A man of questionable means, during this stint on the street Tony bought both the builders yard and a house for Jason, paid Fiz and Tyrone off to prevent them taking his son to court for negligence, bought a 50% share in Barlow’s Buys, compensated various shady characters for trashing the shop and threatening Liz, forked out for Steve’s wedding, and paid his tax bill, but later got the money back and more besides by conning him into selling his 50% share in the Rovers to the fictitious Travis Limited, AKA the inimitable Tony Stewart.

In addition to Tony’s brilliant portrayal by Terence Maynard, what I enjoyed about his return was the trajectory from January 2014 to now and how the storylines which played out revealed his depth of character. While cocksure and confident from the off, Tony was prone to the odd error of judgment. Various well meaning but ill thought out gestures angered Jason who resented his father’s interference. Seeing Tony baffled at how he’d managed to offend revealed a weakness in his otherwise confident demeanour. It showed that when Tony allowed his emotional urges to inform his dubious actions, the outcome wasn’t always as he might have intended. 

As time progressed, his urges and emotions began to dominate, and his life began to unravel. It’s hard to know which was a worse error of judgement for a man like Tony, moving in with Liz, or having an affair with Tracy. While the exposure of his infidelity would prove to be his ultimate undoing, I think his emasculation while living in the Rovers was the real driver for much of his subsequent behaviour.

Finding himself funding Steve’s wedding and getting none of the credit as well as being asked to pay his tax bill saw him mocked by Tracy for being a doormat. This wounded Tony's ego and saw him rail against the situation he found himself in, as if intent on restoring his masculinity. Fake assaults, imaginary debt collectors and plans for a non-existent trip to Spain ensued, all of which saw Tony trick Steve out of his share of the Rovers.

When his infidelity and betrayal was revealed by Tracy on Steve and Michelle’s wedding day, he disappeared.

While he received a frosty reception on his return, everything changed when Jason was hospitalised after a beating from Callum. Eileen and Tony united over their son, and we saw Tony crying for the first time, revealing his guilt at abandoning his son and his upset at failing to protect him now. 

Once Tony’s lowest ebb had been reached, and we had seen the full breadth of his character, he began to regenerate, gaining his lost power and agency. Angry, frustrated and hell bent on revenge, he turned full alpha-male once more, and exacted his punishment on Callum with a violent beating. We were reminded of the risks attached to his combination of emotion and action when Liz interrupted to tell him “You can still be a good father to him, but not like this”. After letting Callum go, Tony revealed that he was concerned that it was the only way he knew how, and that it was all he could do for his son. 

Motivated by his desire for revenge and to protect his son, Tony was back to himself, saving the day at Callum’s flat when Jason sought his own revenge, and torching Callum’s car. But his emotions were about to betray him a final time when Liz duped him into extracting himself from Barlow’s Buys, and signing Steve’s share of the pub back to him. As Tony found himself on his knees proposing, he was stunned to learn he’d been conned himself. 

You might ask how such a shrewd man would allow himself to be duped in such a manner, but when you look back at his almost two year return to the cobbles, the answer is clear; when it comes to matters of the heart, Tony’s clever, calculating ways take a back seat, and he pays for it every time, because the combination of emotion and deeds borne out of a head full of questionable morals has proven a deadly mix.

I get the strong impression, however, that Tony is going to be okay. The fact that he's resourceful and a survivor makes his character infinitely interesting and unpredictable; and the fact that he also lets his heart do the talking endears him. "Try not to kill anyone", his parting retort to Tracy's "try not to pine for me", sums up Tony's attitude and ability to pick himself up and dust himself off, and must rank as one of the best parting lines uttered on the street.

Tony will be very much missed, and I sincerely hope we haven't seen the last of him. Not only are we at the loss of of Terence Maynard’s great performances, but characters of Tony’s ilk are in short supply. Coronation Street needs that strong, brooding, seductive, yet flawed, alpha-male, and while it may not be the time to introduce any more new characters considering the number that have joined of late, this is most certainly a role which needs filling.

By Emma Hynes
Twitter: @ELHynes




Deirdre: A Life on Coronation Street - official ITV tribute to a soap icon. Available here.


Follow the Bluenose CorrieBlog on Twitter and Facebook

Saturday, 30 August 2014

The Men of Weatherfield


(This post was originally posted by Graeme N on the Coronation Street Blog in August 2014, reposted with permission.)

The return of the wonderful Jim McDonald last week has made me ponder the state of Coronation Street's men. We all know that Corrie has always been dominated by the strong female characters but male representation is also very important.

Big Jim is a man's man. He has his demons but all he really wants is the love of a good woman (Elizabeth) and the respect of his sons. Most of the time these days he's some way off achieving these goals but he always gives it a damn good try. And normally clad head to foot in denim.

Jim follows a tradition of Corrie men that was long epitomised by Len Fairclough. Len was a bit rough around the edges, not afraid of a hard drinking session or a good brawl in the street. However he was also a local councillor and respected businessman. People would go to him for help and advice in times of need. And above all else he married the Weatherfield Warbler herself, Rio Rita. However apart from Len and his sidekick Ray Langton, who else was there? Mike Baldwin was too smooth, Ken Barlow wore too many woolly liberal cardigans and Stan Ogden was far too feckless. Perhaps the man's man has always been in short supply in Weatherfield?

Who are the contenders these days amidst Corrie's ever bulging cast?


I remember early on, RIta commented that Owen Armstrong reminded her of Len. I have to say at the time, he did to me too. Now though I'm not so sure. Tony Stewart, currently stepping out with Jim's fair Elizabeth is also a bit rough and ready but he's far too sly and cunning for me. I'd rule Steve and Lloyd out straight away. Lovely as they both undoubtedly are, their girlfriends constantly run rings around them and not often in a good, palatable way.

Nick Tilsley is too camp and petulant, David will always look too young and Dev is just Dev. Rob has been taken down the killer route and lovely Roy is in a category all of his own. Peter Barlow meanwhile has soaked up enough personality flaws for the entire district. Who does that leave us with?

Jason Grimshaw is a true bloke - the character's development and sense of maturity over the years has been impressive. Ryan Thomas has taken Jason a long way since his early appearances. He's the only male presence in the Grimshaw household with a bit of integrity and a backbone at the moment. I just hope he rumbles his unpleasant father and equally toxic brother before they ruin his business.

Perhaps a bit of an odd contender, but there's always our Kirkeh. He may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer (something I think the writers sometimes take too far) but he'll always stand up for his sister, no matter how deranged she becomes. He's also a steadfast supporter of Beth, Craig and Chesney. 

Finally there's Gary Windass. There's a streak of the bad lad in Gary regardless of where he's at in life. Gary's decision to go to war and the aftermath of his life as a soldier were beautifully written and poignantly, powerfully portrayed. Does his link to the army put him in the Jim McDonald mould? 

Kevin Webster will also be returning to the fold again shortly. Is he the epitome of the Weatherfield bloke? Or is he too fists first, think later? 

So who, for you, is currently the archetypical Coronation Street bloke? Which Corrie men do you think need to "man up" and who would you like to see more of (in a manner of speaking)?

Follow me on Twitter @GraemeN82 




Follow the Bluenose CorrieBlog on Twitter and Facebook
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...